Mind Mapping: the methodology of choice
An essential part of management, whether as a primary or as a delegated
responsibility, is the search, definition and implementation of an optimal response to an
intellectual challenge. Thus, for the best possible result it draws on both brain
hemispheres:
|
LEFT
|
RIGHT
|
|
Knowledge
|
Insight
|
|
Logic
|
Intuition
|
|
Deductive
|
Associative
|
|
Structural
|
Creative
|
|
Rules
|
Assessment
|
|
YANG
|
YIN
|
|
Rigour
|
Flexibility
|
|
Formal
|
Pictorial
|
|
Science
|
Art
|
To maximise effectiveness, any methodology we bring to bear should therefore
accommodate and coordinate these two sides. Most "traditional" development systems
(e.g. logical deduction, precedence/succession analysis, elimination scenarios)
originate in the realms of science and philosophy, are based on linear progression, and
thus lean heavily towards the left.
During the 80s of the last century, an innovative approach saw the light of day, actually
allowing for iterative refinement through the interaction of both components: mind
mapping. A key strength proved to be the embedded marriage between
consistency/rigour and flexibility/dynamism, where the level of optimisation was only
limited by the "quality" of the practitioner(s), the wealth of the reference base and the
affordable time investment. An initial drawback was the paper-based, free format
recording method, requiring a common location, sizeable props and a modicum of
design skills, thus creating a threshold against major or repeated revisions. These
impediments were largely removed with the introduction of computer based maps
during the 90s, and further functionality enhancements in the new millennium. This
approach not only earned high acclaim in its own right, in conjunction with interactive
screen sharing it proved of singular efficiency and effectiveness in a distributed
collaboration environment, where a combination of individual and concurrent updating
now became feasible.
I have used mind mapping since the mid 90s as my preferred technique to address
complex problems and projects. In my support practice I now suggest it to my clients as
the default technique. Notwithstanding that, of course I accept the occasional rejection,
as compulsive deployment would largely eliminate the advantages.
In my experience, mind mapping applies to each stage and all aspects of the
endeavour, whilst at the same time ensuring straightforward and dependable phase
transitions. Notably it can be used for:
-
project and process management
-
brainstorming
-
conceptualising
-
decision finding
-
documentation
-
communication
-
induction
-
implementation
-
review.
Currently there are several high quality PC-based tool suites on the market. I chose
MindJet's MindManager, partly because of my familiarity with this package since its
inception, but also because of its versatility, with specific templates and procedures for
brainstorming, sanitizing, documentation, project management, and even web content
management (e.g. used in the implementation of this site).
1. About
